Colonial Subjugation and Human Rights Abuses: Twenty-First Century Violations Against Brazil’s Rural Indigenous Xukuru Nation

Marcia Mikulak


This article addresses the struggle of rural Xukuru indigenous peoples in Pesqueira, Pernambuco, Brazil as they organize to stop historical violence against them and work to regain their constitutional right to their ancestral lands. The article illustrates what a single researcher working along-side rural people's and NGOs can do to make change in an oppressive state. With the birth of the United Nations (UN) in 1945 and the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, member states have often provided rhetorical validity to human rights documents and conventions; a rhetoric that is often ignored upon return to their sovereign territories. It is well understood that international human rights documents are based on constructed realities that historically validated Western European notions about the rights of individuals (Said 1994, 1979; Ignatieff, 2001; Niezen, 2003). As a member of the United Nations and a signatory of international human rights documents, Brazil has turned a blind eye to human rights norms as applied to Indigenous[i] peoples. This article 1) presents a brief history of Portuguese colonial contact with Brazil’s Indigenous peoples; 2) briefly discusses the Indian movement in Brazil as a background for the contextualization of the Indigenous Xukurus’ fight for the return of their ancestral lands in the Serra do Ororubá, in the state of Pernambuco in the late 20th and early 21st centuries; and 3) articulates the human rights abuses perpetrated against them by the Brazilian nation-state.

[i] “Indigenous†is capitalized throughout this chapter in order to demark respect to and for the ethnic identity of Brazil’s first peoples.

Full Text:



Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity. Sociology, 40, 511-528.

Alix, L. G. (1999). The permanent forum for indigenous peoples: The struggle for a new partnership. Retrieved from

Almeida, E. A. d. (1997). Xukuru, filhos da mãe natureza: Uma história de resistência e luta. Olinda: Centro de Cultura Luiz Freire Projeto Xukuru, 25.

American Anthropological Association. (2012). Code of ethics. Retrieved from

Amnesty International. (2015). Annual report Brazil: The state of the world’s human rights. Brazil. Retrieved from

Amnesty International. (2015). Foreigners in our own country: Indigenous peoples in Brazil. Retrieved from

Amnesty International. (2015). We know our rights and we will fight for them: Indigenous rights in Brazil. Retrieved from

Anderson, C. (1999). The Indian southwest, 1580–1830: Ethnogenesis and reinvention. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

Arruti, J. M. (2006). Etnogêneses indígenas. In B. Ricardo, & F. Ricardo (Eds.), Povos indígenas no Brasil 2001–2005 (pp. 50-54). São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental.

Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press.

Benson, P., & Kevin Lewis O’Neill. (2001). Facing Risk: Levinas, Ethnography, and Ethics. Anthropology of Consciousness, Vol. 18(2), 29-55.

Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.

Bourgois, P. (1990). Confronting anthropological ethics: Ethnographic lessons from central America. Journal of Peace Research, 27(1), 43-54.

Brasileiro, S., Ferreira, I., & Fialho, V. (1998). Estratégias e tentativas de regularização da terra indígena Xukuru. (Human rights document). Recife: ANAI.

Brazilian Constitution. (2006). Brazilian Constitution 1988. Retrieved from

Brazilian Constitution. (2010). Brazilian constitution. Retrieved from

Brooke, J.Brazil steps up drive to protect Indian lands. Retrieved from

Butler, J. (1995). Conscience doth make subjects of us all. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Cabinet for the Legal Assistance of Popular Organizations (GAJOP). (2009). Cabinet for the Legal Assistance of Popular Organizations (GAJOP). Retrieved from

Cockcroft, J. (1989). Neighbors in turmoil: Latin America Harpercollins College Div.

Conselho Indigenista Missionário. (2011, ). Newsletter No. 866: Chief of the Xukuru people sentenced prior to his defense witnesses’ testimony. Retrieved from

da Silva, E. (2007, ). História, memórias e identidade entre os Xukuru do Ororubá. Retrieved from

Feldman, A. (1995). In Nordstrom C., Robben A. (Eds.), Ethnographic states of emergency. In fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fialho, V. (1992). As Fronterias do Ser Xukuru: Estratégias e Conflitos de um Grupo Indígena no Nordeste. (Unpublished Masters). MN/UFRJ, Recife.

Fialho, V., Neves, R., & Figueiroa, M. (2011). Plantaram Xicão: Os Xukuru do Ororubá e a criminalização do direito ao território. Manaus: PNCSA-UEA/UEA Edições.

Gabinete de Assessoria Jurídica rs Organizações Populares (GAJOP). ( No. (81) 3223-0081). Rua do Sossego, 432, Boa Vista, Recife - CEP 50050-080: Gabinete de Assessoria Jurídica rs Organizações Populares (GAJOP).

Garcia-Navarro, L. (2013). Brazil’s Indians feclaim land, citing promises, using force. Retrieved from

Glendhill, J. (1999). Moral ambiguities and competing claims to justice. Retrieved from (

Gomes, M. P. (2000). The Indians and Brazil. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Graham, L. R. (2002). How should an Indian speak? Amazonian Indians and the symbolic politics of language in the global public sphere. In D. B. Warren, & J. E. Jackson (Eds.), Indigenous movements, self-representation, and the state in Latin America (). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Guerrero, L., Abramovich, V., González, F., & Carozza, P. (2009).

Relatório No. 98/09[1], petição 4355-02 admissibilidade povo indígena Xucuru Brasil 20 de outubro de 2009. ( No. 98/09[1]).

Hale, C. R. (1997). Consciousness, violence, and the politics of memory in Guatemala. Current Anthropology, 38(5), 817-838.

Hemming, J. (2003). A fresh look at Amazon Indians: Karl von den steinen and curt nimuendajú: Giants of Brazilian Anthropology. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 1(2)

Hemming, J. (2003). Die if you must: Brazilian Indians in the 21st century. Oxford: Pan Books.

Hodgson, D. L. (2002). Introduction: Comparative perspectives on the indigenous rights movement in Africa and the Americas. American Anthropologist, 104(4), 1037-1049.

Hohenthal, W. (1958). Notes on the shucurú Indians of Serra de ARAROBÃ. Revista do Museu Paulista, 8.

Ignatieff, M. (2001). The attack on human rights. Foreign Affairs, 80(6), 102-116.

Inter-American Commission for Human Rights IACHR. (2004). Inter-American Commission for Human Rights IACHR, 5-152. Retrieved from

Inter-American Commission for Human Rights IACHR. (2009). Inter-American Commission for Human Rights IACHR . Retrieved from

International Labor Organization.Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention 169. Retrieved from

International Labor Organization. (2015). Indigenous and tribal peoples convention C107. Convention concerning the protection and integration of indigenous and other tribal and semi-tribal populations in independent countries. Retrieved from

Jackson, J. (1991). Being and becoming Indian in the vaupes. In G. Urban, & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Nation-states and Indians in Latin America () University of Texas Press.

Jones, J. (2011). Who are we? Producing group identity through everyday practices of conflict and discourse. Sociological Perspectives, 54(2), 139-162.

Kovats-Bernat, C., J. (2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 208-222.

Lima de Portal, F. (2009). Saúde e ambiente entre os indios Xukuru de Ororubá observações preliminares. I Colóquio de História da UFRPE - “Brasil e Portugal: nossa história ontem e hoje†(Masters). Available from

MacDowell Santos, C. (2009). Indigenous struggles for land security, human rights, and the state: The case of the Xukuru in Brazil. Unpublished paper presented at the 104th American Sociological Association, San Francisco. Unpublished manuscript. 18.

Marques, G. (2010). In Mikulak M. (Ed.), Personal communication. Xukuru lawyer for the defense of Cacique Marcos Xukuru. Recife, Pernambuco:

Melatti, J. D. (2007). Ãndios do Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.

Mikulak, M. (2002). The social construction of disposable children: Street and working children in Minas Gerais, Brazil (Ph.D). . (Dissertation UMI Number: 3072249).

Mikulak, M. (2007). The political economy of everyday life: Working children in curvelo, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2)

Mikulak, M. (2011). The symbolic power of color: Constructions of race, skin-color, and identity in Brazil. Humanity & Society, 35, 62-99.

Minde, H. (Ed.). (2008). Indigenous peoples: Self-determination, knowledge identity. The Netherlands: Eburon Delft.

Nagel, J. (1995). American Indian ethnic renewal: Politics and the resurgence of identity. Sociological Review, 60, 947-965.

Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity, and sexuality: intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

Oxford English Dictionary. (2015). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from

Ramos, A. R. (1997). Cultural Survival: The Indigenous Movement in Brazil: A Quarter Century of Ups and Downs. Retrieved from

Ramos, A. R. (1998). Indigenism: Ethnic politics in brazil. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Renato, A. (2007). Povos indígenas de Pernambuco: Identidade, diversidade e conflito. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.

Scheper-Hughes, N.Primacy of the ethical. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409-420.

Silva, E. (2007). Xukuru: Histíoria e memória e memórias dos “caboclos†da Serra do Ororubá. Unpublished manuscript.

Speed, S. (2006). At the xrossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66-76.

Stocks, A. (2005). Too much for too few: Problems of indigenous land rights in Latin America. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 89-104.

Turner, T. (2002). Indigenous movements, self-representation, and the state in Latin America. In K. B. Warren, & E. J. Jean (Eds.), Representation, Polyphony, and the Construction of Power in a Kayapó Video (pp. 229-250). Austin: University of Texas Press.

United Nations. (2008). United Nations declaration on the Rights of indigenous Peoples. Retrieved from, Article 40, Article 27

United Nations. (2008). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from

Warren, J. W. (2001). Racial revolutions: Antiracism and Indian resurgence in Brazil. London: Duke University Press.

Warren, K. B., & Jackson, J. E. (2002). Indigenous movements, self-representation, and the state in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas press.

Wilson, A., Richard. (2006). Afterword to Anthropology and human hights in a new keyâ€: The social sife of human rights. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 77.

XE. (2013). XE Currency Converter. Retrieved from

Xukuru, M. (2010). In Mikulak M. (Ed.), Personal conservation with Cacique Marcos Xukuru. Unpublished fieldwork interview data

Xukuru, M. (2012). In Mikulak M. (Ed.), Personal conservations with Cacique Marcos Xukuru. Unpublished fieldwork. Interview data